# Could anyone with CI Run access pls review my PRs?

**URL:** <https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/could-anyone-with-ci-run-access-pls-review-my-prs/5271>\
**Category:** Development\
**Tags:** performance\
**Created:** [May 29, 2026, 9:31pm UTC](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/could-anyone-with-ci-run-access-pls-review-my-prs/5271 "2026-05-29T21:31:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pranav](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a4c791/32.png) [@pranav](https://forums.foundationdb.org/u/pranav)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2026, 9:31pm UTC](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/could-anyone-with-ci-run-access-pls-review-my-prs/5271/1 "2026-05-29T21:31:27Z")

</div>

Hi, I’m new to this forum & foundationDB community. So, last week, I’ve posted two PRs which are performance-based but they haven’t been reviewed yet by anyone with access to running the CI checks. So, I’m posting it here for visibility.

Could you pls run the CI checks & review my PRs:

1. [perf(fdbclient): reduce arena allocations in MutationRef deep-copy constructors by pchintar · Pull Request #13270 · apple/foundationdb · GitHub](https://github.com/apple/foundationdb/pull/13270)

2. [Reduce arena allocations when materializing RocksDB range read results by pchintar · Pull Request #13273 · apple/foundationdb · GitHub](https://github.com/apple/foundationdb/pull/13273)

Both cut Arena allocations by half and they’re non-tedious in the sense that it’s just a few lines of replacement code, so it must be quick and easy enough to review imo, so could anyone pls with CI access review them? thnx