# Use case of versionstamp and behavior of pack\_with\_versionstamp

**URL:** <https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/use-case-of-versionstamp-and-behavior-of-pack-with-versionstamp/869>\
**Category:** Using FoundationDB\
**Tags:** bindings\
**Created:** [November 14, 2018, 9:14pm UTC](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/use-case-of-versionstamp-and-behavior-of-pack-with-versionstamp/869 "2018-11-14T21:14:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaurav](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b487fb/32.png) [@gaurav](https://forums.foundationdb.org/u/gaurav)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2018, 5:18am UTC](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/use-case-of-versionstamp-and-behavior-of-pack-with-versionstamp/869/2 "2018-11-15T05:18:19Z")

</div>

Could you please check following conversations if they answer some of your queries?

[[VersionStamp vs CommittedVersion](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/versionstamp-vs-committedversion/600)]  
[[VersionStamp uniqueness and monotonicity](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/versionstamp-uniqueness-and-monotonicity/602)]  
[[Implementing VersionStamps in bindings](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/implementing-versionstamps-in-bindings/250/)]

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/use-case-of-versionstamp-and-behavior-of-pack-with-versionstamp/869)._