This is not expected, and thank you for bringing this to our attention.
Digging through things, it appears that this tarball in particular is not a part of our builder’s published artifacts, but is instead dynamically generated as part of deploying the website.
According to the internal repository of artifacts for 6.1.8, the md5 hashes of the individual files in the tarball should be
So it appears that we have mistakenly regenerated the tarball, and the hash of it has changed due to the embedded metadata being different. I’ve filed #1970 to track addressing this, as users of this file should always copy the hash rather than download it to guard against malicious replacement, and anything incentivizing doing the opposite is bad.